how to run #dnd character builder on mac, linux and ipad

As a Mac user for nearly two years now I had been "clean" of using Windows for some time when I started getting back in to Dungeons and Dragons.  The latest version of D&D is good fun and Wizards have provided a character builder application to speed up the process of trawling through all their material to build your ultimate hero character.

http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Tool.aspx?x=dnd/4new/tool/characterbuilder

However, it only runs on Windows and explicitly does not support Linux or Mac, and I've tried most things including Wine and Mono.  So I installed an old copy of Windows XP in to a Virtual Box and that does the job... but wasn't really the answer to my problem.  I simply don't want Windows on my Mac.  Also, I would like to be able to use the character builder on my iPad.

The solution came to me in a dream ... well not really, but the answer to use some kind of hosted Windows service.

I decided to try with Amazon AWS ( http://aws.amazon.com/ ) which lets you create "virtual computers" on the internet (commonly known as a VM, Virtual Machine or VPS, Virtual Private Server).  

It's pretty straight forward to get going so long as you're not a complete computer novice.  I simply span up a Windows 2008 Basic Server, connected, downloaded and installed Character Builder, signed in to get the full version and now I can access it via my Mac, Linux and even my iPad!

Of course there is a cost, but the advantage of using Amazon AWS is that you only get charged for the disk space and processing power you use.  When I'm not using the Character Builder, I simply shutdown the instance.  I'm estimating this should cost me around £3/$5 per month to run character builder in this way, but will definitely keep the community posted about that.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

free to a good home - magic the gathering cards

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

using ipad as a second screen for my mac book pro

This is using an app called Air Display.  It requires the installation of a driver on your host machine and then works pretty well.

The mouse moves at pretty much normal speed, but moving windows around is a little jerky.  Email / browsing is not so good as I'm just used to the extra screen space on my mac.  However, it's great for getting those chat windows out of the way or perhaps throwing up some reference material.

The iPad itself is in the official iPad case - it's a bit crap to be honest.  To get it to stand up like that I had to prop it up with a mug and my unpacked iPhone 4 ... I knew it would be useful for something, lol.

Loving the iPad though - it really feels like the future is in your hands, but I think I'll have to get a much better stand for it if I plan on using it like this for long periods.
Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [2]

seeking feedback on idea for running competitive #dnd 4e

Introduction:

This is inspired a little by D&D Miniatures, which is a skirmish game based on 3rd edition (revised) D&D and it's why I have so many minis ;-)  

I wanted build something similar but truer to the D&D 4e actual rules.  D&D Minis uses a bastardisation of the D&D 3rd edition rules (and character stats) and to me feels like it is missing something.  However, I haven't played since the first version of D&D Minis and believe those rules have been revised since then so couldn't comment on the latest version.

I also wondered how games that have a large number of players cope - I see it from time to time on the twitter #dnd tag and it got me thinking about if it would be possible to run concurrent games in which multiple parties of players might interact.  So this could be a one off event, or a way to tie in to separate games for a bit of overlap. 

Basic Premise:

Pitting your wits against monsters and NPCs is one thing - but how about pitting your wits against each other?

Two parties of adventurers compete to complete a randomly assigned objective before the other party.

Setup:

You'll need a DM and at least two players.  The players are split in to two teams.

Each team builds a party of adventurers.  Each character should be the same level - this will probably be determined before hand by the DM.

Each team then selects a random mission from the following:
- Wipe out the other party
- Slay a certain number of monsters
- Capture the artifact and exit the scenario
- Defend the artfact, do not allow it to exit the scenario
- Hold an area for a certain number for rounds
- etc ... I'm sure I can dream up more and am open to suggestions and variations / elaborations on the above ...

If either party is wiped out the other party could continue to play to see if they defeat the monsters in play and complete their objective.

Each mission is unique, so you can see how the objectives of the missions could be in opposition to each other.  Not to mention the underlying objective that your party has to complete their mission before the other party.

The DM's role is that of referee and to play any monsters that might get in the way of adventurers.

Gut feeling says the ideal number of players would be seven - a DM and two teams of three players each taking a character each.  A game would probably take 3 to 5 hours to play.  I believe this could also work really well with two players taking three characters each.

Mechanics:

The mechanics would basically be the same as that of a single encounter in D&D 4e.  

Each round everyone rolls for initiative and the DM indicates who can take their turn. 

Things like listening and searching can be minor or standard actions depending on how hard you want the character to try.  The DM should apply appropriate penalties.   While moving a character might still need to make acrobatics/athletics checks, and so on - this is up to the DM.

While the whole map would be visible from the outset, monsters would remain hidden from play until they are detected through line of sight (or some other mechanism at the player's disposal).  If monsters move out of line of sight, it is the DM's discretion as to whether the monsters are hidden again.

Conclusion:

So what do you think?  Would it work?  

Is there anything you'd add or remove?

Would it be possible to build a campaign around this?

Any other thoughts?

Thanks in advance!

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

At linlithgow for a picnic

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

exchange between myself and @ericjoyce re: #leadersdebate

Eric Joyce: Gordon Brown was good, and yet serious, tonight.Folk want their pm to be serious; ' 2 boys squabbling at bathtime' .Surely quote of evening.

brindy (me): @ericjoyce you call that serious? it was a cheap shot, especially for saying what you lot get up to in parliament. it's like a playground.

So what I'm getting at here is that if you watch parliament on TV or listen to it on the radio they - as in MPs - act disgracefully.  They pepper their speech with false pleasantries and take every opportunity to slag each other off.  And how is "2 boys squabbling at bathtime" a serious comment?  It just isn't.  Obviously these people are going to have heated discussions during this thing.  Clegg and Cameron did, Clegg and Brown did, Brown and Cameron did.  But only Clegg refrained from throwing in what looked like pre-rehearsed insults made especially for situations that would inevitably rise.

EJ : @brindy Us lot?  Like you lot in debt collection agencies?  No scope for individuality  Your choice.

Thanks Eric!  This bit of information, which is wrong I might add, was actually passed to you in a private email / letter. 

And I'm not sure what the latter part means anyway.  As for individuality the house of commons is like Attack of Clones in suits.

me: @ericjoyce i don't work in a debt collection agency

me: @ericjoyce all i'm saying is, that it is rich to say 'people want serious' when you all act like children in the house.

If you don't believe me just watch parliament on TV or listen to them on the radio.  It's frankly embarrassing that our country is run by people who behave like this.

EJ: @brindy Ah.  You tweeted that you did.  Were you lying?

Nope, I'm no liar and I'm pretty sure I never tweeted that I work for a DCA - people who know me will know that I feel strongly about DCAs, so I felt I had to clarify the situation....

me: @ericjoyce i work for a credit management consultancy - some of our clients happen to be DCAs.

BAH! Would rather not have had laid that out so barely.  I guess I should have DM'd him at this point. 

EJ: @brindy Fair enough.  And i know and respect the difference. Try that in Sun.  Shit to generalise about folk, whatever their job.

I had gone to bed by this point.  But while I admit I was generalising, I feel it was fair based on what I have seen and heard of MPs behaviour in the house.   Note that up to now I had not DM'd him at all within this exchange.

EJ (via DM) : You make your own calls now. It's all real.  Unrestricted cynicism is a clear sign of immaturity.  No more DMs.

I'm not even sure what this means.

So before the leaders debate I had a pretty low opinion of all politicians and especially the so called leaders.  The only party I actively support is the Pirate Party since I believe a party based system is archaic and unfair and the Pirate Party's "single issue" is one I strongly believe in and one I don't believe the Tories or Labour genuinely support.  

However, I did have a reasonably high opinion of Eric Joyce.  Even though he rarely rebels against the Labour party he rallied well during the #debill debacle, is quite responsive to communication and appears to genuinely be concerned for the Falkirk area.  The same cannot be said for the other candidates except for Cllr John McNally who actually works for the council.

This morning, my opinion of Nick Clegg is through the roof.  He is clear, consistent, funny yet mature and demonstrates the ability to lead.  I am impressed.

My opinions of the other two have not changed - they did not surprise me at all.  It was hard to listen to either of them without wondering if basically everything they are saying is lies.  They both have little 'ticks' which make them appear untrustworthy, not to mention a great deal of previous record.

And I'm afraid to say my opinion of Eric Joyce has dwindled somewhat too after returning to my twitter client to review last night's exchange..  This is unfortunate as I had already decided to offer my assistance (what little that might be) to whoever is MP for Falkirk after the election.  So that's awkward as it is likely to be Mr Joyce who wins, but hopefully we can put this exchange behind us and move on for the benefit of the community.
Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

#debill #deact has forced me to watch tv again :(

I haven't watched TV since February 2006.  At least, not live broadcast TV. For ages it was my dream that I could watch TV on demand and I thought we were getting pretty close to that until recently.  

Yes, the dreaded Digital Economy Bill / Act has pissed unceremoniously all over that dream.

My TV viewing consists mainly of Science Fiction series, you know, Stargate, True Blood, V, Battlestar Galactica, etc.  My approach was to download from the internet and then buy the DVD boxset when it was a reasonable price.  I've done this with a few things including Stargate, BSG and Lost and intended to do it with True Blood, V, etc.  

Recently my approach has been to download shows in order to catch up, then watch them as they appear on iTunes - meaning that I wouldn't buy them on DVD, but I have a copy I can call my own on disk anyway.  I also downloaded the first series of the IT Crowd and then enjoyed it so much that I bought the entire series on iTunes.

However, I have to admit that a number of shows I just download and watch as they are released.  Mainly because they are not available on iTunes until much later, though as above I do intend to buy them on iTunes as they appear.

A pleasant side product of not watching live broadcast TV is that I don't have to pay for a TV license.  I have definitely spent more than the TV license on iTunes though, but it has suited me well and I own what I pay for.

But now, because of the #debill, we have calculated that we cannot afford to get caught downloading material from our usual sources so we would have to buy it on iTunes.  However, given the amount of shows we watch, it is actually cheaper to buy a TV license and Sky+.  Yes, we're considering re-joining the TV watching community, but who is going to lose out?  I'm afraid iTunes - we simply can't afford to maintain both.  

This is highly disappointing to me as it feels like a real step backwards.  It also means that if I want to own what I am watching I effectively have to pay for it twice (either on DVD or iTunes).  

Today the Liberal Democrats have announced they will push to repeal the #debill - a nice gesture, but unless they win out-right (yeah right), that is all it is as I very much doubt Labservative will move on the matter.  I intend speaking to my candidate about this and other issues.

Right, I better finishing making our kedgeree dinner. :)
Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

brindopia... maybe one day

Well, I'm pretty fucked off with this country's so called government.  Right now we're in limbo as we allegedly decide on a new government.  At this point, I direct you to this:
http://www.voterpower.org.uk/falkirk

Pretty sad and while #debill #deact (the Digital Economy Bill) was being forced through in the wash-up, the electoral reform bill got kicked out.  #undemocracy in action.

People of the UK, I implore you... WAKE UP!

We do not live in a democracy.  

It is at best an oligarchy wearing the dress of democracy.  

In less than a month we will elect a new government.  A government which will no doubt change it's leadership at least once, if not more times, during it's term of office.   You do not chose your leadership, you choose which group of fools gets to choose your leadership and then tools like Brown, Blair, Major and Thatcher (in my memory) get to dictate with zero accountability and make decisions which affect our lives on a daily basis without consultation or proper due process.  And the fools that choose those tools are the lawmakers who are above the law.  Watch how three MPs accused of fraudulently using expenses will be exonerated at the expense of the tax-payer.  And if they're not, they are simply scape goats to try and placate the masses.

DO NOT LET THEM TELL YOU THIS IS NOT HOW IT IS.

Because if it wasn't like this, Blair and Thatcher would be in jail for crimes against humanity.  They could share a cell as well to save some money.

£65,000, give or take a few pounds, is how much an MP earns and don't forget that they claim expenses for just about everything.  Long hours they work, well I should damn well think so for the money and half they time they don't even turn up to parliament to discuss the issues that people are interested in.  When you live in a constituency where nearly as many people who voted against the winning MP as did the MP will pick and choose the issues that matter based on who makes the most noise and who they deem to have influence with other voters.  "But it's hard to be in your constituency and parliament" - I agree and that's why after 300 years of rich pickings, it is time for the system to change.

I have a dream.  A dream where adults are actively involved in politics on a daily basis - just part of their every day lives, no political parties and a media which reports news rather than tries to manipulate the masses.  A dream where children are given an education that is worthwhile; maths, languages, science, philosophy, politics and they leave school wanting to be an active part of society and how society is run.  A dream where capitalism doesn't filter society in to classes like a centrifuge sorts the grit from the cream. 

In the 21st Century, and already a decade in, we have the technology to achieve this, to achieve direct government, but we don't have the will... yet.  The people of this country are a sleeping dragon and I believe the dragon is waking up, finally disturbed by the filth rotting in it's den.

But my dream is a bizarre utopia that cannot be achieved overnight.  So how do we get there?

Move to AV?  Move to PR? No.  "Electoral reform" is just a tool that they will use to tell you that things are changing.  A step in the right direction, you might say.

WRONG

You are still voting for the oligarchy (i.e. you have no choice at all!) and at the end of day the MPs still earn stupid salaries, claim expenses and are all but untouchable both in their job and legally.

The system has to change from the ground up.

I propose a party-less republic is the next appropriate government for the UK.  

Candidates stand like MPs now, but are not allowed to be affiliated to a party, in fact parties are simply abolished.  Thus candidates stand 100% on their own merit.  A candidate may wish to focus on local issues, or may expressly be interested in the role of president.  It is up to the candidate how they "sell" themselves to the voting public.  A candidate has to be over 25, but no particular qualifications are required.  The age limit is arbitrary but by 25 it can be assumed the candidate has had enough experience in life to make reasonable decisions.

Any candidate can stand anywhere, but I believe in this system local candidates will be chosen over strangers who simply want a seat, as is happens now.  Constituency first.  Once all the candidates are chosen and form the senate, the senate chooses a shortlist of candidates from those that qualify (35 years of age and citizens of the UK for at least 14 years) to be become president.  Remember, parties are expressly forbidden, so again candidates are standing on their own merit.  The country choses the president using an AV system.  The runner up becomes the vice-president.  

Once elected to office the president forms a government from the senate.  At this stage the president has all the usual presidential powers but can be overruled by a majority vote in the senate.

Technology should be used to avoid unnecessary travel, using video-conferencing, etc.

And a term of office is precisely 4 years, with no president serving more than two terms (ever).

Or something like that.  I don't have a political qualification (as you can probably tell) but it's clear to me that the current system is severely flawed and that slowly our rights are being eroded.  

The sleeping dragon needs to wake up - it's time for the UK to change.
Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

“the ship that made the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs.”

In the movie "Star Wars Episode IV : A New Hope" while negotiating
passage to Alderaan, Han Solo is astounded that Luke and Obiwan
haven't heard of the of the Millenium Falcon, "the ship that made the
Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs".

Lots of people note that this is an expression of distance, not time
... so what's the big deal?

Well I think the clue is in something Han says later on...

“Travelling through hyperspace ain’t like dusting crops, boy…without
precise calculations you could fly right through a star or bounce too
close to a supernova, and that would end your trip real quick,
wouldn’t it?”

So I got thinking that 12 parsecs is significant because the Falcon is
able to navigate around space obstacles (e.g. stars, black holes and
other things with large gravitational fields) in such a way that the
route that most normal ships would have to take is significantly
reduced.

Later I discovered that this is explained on the Star Wars Wiki and
wish I'd just read that first. =)

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Parsec

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

About

Been around a bit - online and off! Posterous seems like a great service, so I'm posting here for a bit.

I'm a geek/nerd/software engineer/software architect from England living in Scotland. I like Java, OSGi and Flex technologies.

I like heavy metal, guitar, running, sci-fi and all that good stuff.